[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12884518#action_12884518
]
Matthew T. Adams commented on JDO-652:
--------------------------------------
@Andy: Based on your response, I must be misunderstanding the QueryDSL
approach. My understanding is that a prerequisite to the creation of the
QueryDSL objects is your object model. If the two can be developed in a
conventional IDE, please show or explain to me how. A conventional, field
name-based query api would not require the objects to exist beforehand, unless
it used the as-yet-nonextant language features that we'd like to have.
> Provision of a statically-typed refactor-friendly query capability for JDOQL
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-652
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652
> Project: JDO
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: api, specification, tck
> Reporter: Andy Jefferson
> Fix For: JDO 3 maintenance release 1
>
>
> There are various querying capabilities of this type around. JPA2 has its
> Criteria query API. Third party solutions like QueryDSL also exist, in its
> case providing a JDOQL implementation (as well as JPQL, and HQL). We should
> seriously consider introducing something along these lines in the JDO2.4
> timeframe.
> There is a comparison of JPA Criteria with QueryDSL over at
> http://source.mysema.com/forum/mvnforum/viewthread_thread,49
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
