[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924684#action_12924684
]
Marco commented on JDO-667:
---------------------------
I just added JDO-668 and am thinking a bit more about the Class vs.
className[String] question. Is there a certain reason, why the meta-data
methods don't work with java.lang.Class? Would it be inconsistent to make the
new method getClassesWithMetadata() or getManagedClasses() return a
Collection<java.lang.Class>?
> Extend PersistenceManageFactory to return all known entity classes
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-667
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-667
> Project: JDO
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: JDO 3
> Reporter: Marco
> Fix For: JDO 3 maintenance release 1
>
>
> JDO 3 now has the ability to declare meta-data programmatically. Part of this
> feature is the ability to ask the PersistenceManagerFactory via the method
> getMetadata(java.lang.String) for the meta-data of one single class. But
> there is no way to list all known classes.
> I therefore kindly ask for a new method in PersistenceManagerFactory like
> this:
> Collection<String> getClassesWithMetadata();
> Btw., this is Andy's suggestion posted here:
> http://www.datanucleus.org/servlet/forum/viewthread_thread,6379#33224
> I'd greatly appreciate, if this method became a part of JDO 3.1.
> Edit 1: I just saw the various overloaded methods getManagedObjects(...) in
> PersistenceManager - maybe the alternative method name "getManagedClasses()"
> would be more consistent?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
