It already is. The scope is orthogonal to whether it's optional. -matthew
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Craig L Russell <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Dec 8, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Matthew Adams wrote: > > Hi guys, >> >> I was just looking at the pom in trunk/api and noticed that on line 133, >> the >> Ant dependency is declared optional. This is actually not true, as some >> of >> the code in the test project can't compile without it. I propose removing >> the <optional> line. Cool? >> > > The dependency should be marked "test" instead of "optional" then. > > Cool? > > Craig > >> >> -matthew >> >> -- >> mailto:[email protected] >> skype:matthewadams12 >> yahoo:matthewadams >> aol:matthewadams12 >> google-talk:[email protected]<google-talk%[email protected]> >> <google-talk%[email protected]<google-talk%[email protected]> >> > >> msn:[email protected] <msn%[email protected]> < >> msn%[email protected] <msn%[email protected]>> >> >> http://matthewadams.me >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewadams >> > > Craig L Russell > Architect, Oracle > http://db.apache.org/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected] > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > -- mailto:[email protected] skype:matthewadams12 yahoo:matthewadams aol:matthewadams12 google-talk:[email protected]<google-talk%[email protected]> msn:[email protected] <msn%[email protected]> http://matthewadams.me http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewadams
