[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13138570#comment-13138570
]
Craig L Russell commented on JDO-699:
-------------------------------------
I agree that keeping unmaintained sub-projects in trunk is not good. Moving
them to a new archive directory makes sense. I wouldn't just delete them since
it would then be difficult to find them.
> Archive unmaintained modules
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-699
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-699
> Project: JDO
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: api11, api2-legacy, btree, core2, enhancer2, fostore2,
> model2, query2, ri11, runtime2, tck11, tck2-legacy, util2
> Affects Versions: JDO 3 maintenance release 1
> Reporter: Matthew T. Adams
> Assignee: Matthew T. Adams
> Fix For: JDO 3 maintenance release 1
>
>
> There are many modules in the trunk of the JDO source repo that are no longer
> maintained. I propose to create a new directory "archive" as a peer to
> trunk, branches, releases, and site, then svn-move them from trunk to archive.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
