Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Tim Gallagher, Matthew Adams, Craig Russell

 Agenda:

 1. JDO 3.0.1 release status

No change.

 2. Retire JDO Expert Group mail list?

AI Craig: follow up with Awais Bajwa to see what the issue is.

3. New comment on JDO-647 "Run TCK using Maven2 for consistency" about steps to be done when adding a new configuraton, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-647

Could be just a documentation issue. Either remove the configurations.list or have exectck read the list. To be consistent, exectck should read a file from the tck project. Someone could write a patch.

4. New patch available JDO-556 "JDOHelper should use Java 6 ServiceLoader if available, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-556

Patches under https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-607 should be removed.

Craig still needs to write a test case.

5. News on new feature idea http://osdir.com/ml/jdo-dev-db-apache/2011-11/msg00002.html - possible code contribution from 3M?

Legal is still reviewing the process of contributing to Apache.

6. New patch available JDO-702 "Support for specification of embedded inherited objects", see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-702

The test patch needs to be reviewed.

 7. What's needed to release 3.1?

AI Craig start maintenance release process. The intent is to put the source Framemaker files into the Apache JDO repository.

 8. Other issues

 Action Items from weeks past:

[April 8 2011] AI Craig comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-617 re the utility of the update operator. [Sep 23 2011] AI Michael document when changing dependencies (to DataNucleus) it's necessary to rebuild the exectck project before running tck.

Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Reply via email to