Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell Agenda:
1. JIRA "Support for conditional operator ? : in JDOQL": https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-650 Any objections to including the proposed syntax in the JDO standard? We would need a specification update and a TCK test case. AI Michael post a BNF patch. AI Craig post update patch for specification (description, single string JDOQL, filter, having, and result). Are there already existing DataNucleus test cases that could be modified for the TCK? 2. New Comment on JIRA "Allow makePersistent outside a transaction": https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-589 The JIRA was updated to see if we are reaching consensus. 3. New Comment on JIRA "Specifying NULL elements positioning in ordered columns": https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-721 No objections to adding this to 3.1. The change seems easy enough. 4. JIRA "Modify specification to address NoSQL datastores": https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-651 No news. 5. JDO 3.1 Looks like candidates for 3.1 include 721 and 650. What about 589? 6. Other issues Action Items from weeks past: [Feb 28 2014] AI Everyone: take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-712 [Feb 28 2014] AI Everyone: take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-625 [Dec 13 2013] AI Craig file a JIRA for java.sql.Blob and java.sql.Clob as persistent field types [May 10 2013] AI Everyone take a look Apache ISIS and maybe subscribe to ISIS mail lists. [Aug 24 2012] AI Craig update the JIRAs JDO-689 JDO-690 and JDO-692 about JDOHelper methods. In process. Craig L Russell Architect, Oracle http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
