Hi, small correction: the meeting this week is Thursday May 18.
Regards Michael > NOTE: Next week's meeting will be Thursday May 8 at 9:00 AM PDT > > Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Tilmann Zäschke, Craig Russell > > Agenda: > > 1. JDO-762 "setParameters and setNamedParameters should use thread local > storage" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-762 > > No feedback from anyone. Do others agree that the shared use of Query objects > is a good idea? Are there implementation issues? > > AI Craig write a test case to discover the current behavior of the RI. > > 2. JDO-763 "RI does not implement default of Query.setResult" > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-763 > > When using DataNucleus 5.1.0m3 there are still issues with setResultClass and > setResult. AI Michael file a github DN issue and attach the test case from > TCK. > > 3. JDO-761 "Add TCK test running sample queries from the spec" > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-761 > > With testQuery12, modified to call executeResultList(Object[].class...) fails > with "JDOUserException: Query needs to return objects of type > "[Ljava.lang.Object;" but it was impossible to create a new instance of this > type. ". AI Michael follow up with DN. > > Pp. 191-192 of the specification addresses the requirements for result and > result class. > > 4. JDO-760 "Spec update regarding whether Query.execute() returns List or > Collection" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-760 > > 5. Is anything still unresolved with JDO-749 "Support for java.time types, > and querying using associated methods" > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-749 > > 6. Is anything still unresolved with JDO-745 "Support bitwise operations in > JDOQL" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-745 > > 7. JDO 3.1: Need to go through change lists in JIRA for 3.1 RC1 and 3.1 to > prepare JCP Change Log > > 8. Other issues > > Action Items from weeks past: > > [Apr 12 2017] AI Craig: write a test case to see how the RI behaves JDO-762. > [Feb 24 2017] AI Michael: are there any TCK tests for the new methods JDO-749? > [Feb 24 2017] AI Michael: are there any TCK tests for the new methods? Any > additional spec updates JDO-745? > [Oct 30 2015] AI Craig: File a maintenance review with JCP > [Apr 17 2015] AI Craig: Oracle spec page on JDO need to be updated once the > JCP Maintenance Release for JDO 3.1 is published > [Oct 17 2014] AI Matthew any updates for "Modify specification to address > NoSQL datastores": https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-651? > [Feb 28 2014] AI Everyone: take a look at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-712 > [Feb 28 2014] AI Everyone: take a look at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-625 > [Dec 13 2013] AI Craig file a JIRA for java.sql.Blob and java.sql.Clob as > persistent field types > [Aug 24 2012] AI Craig update the JIRAs JDO-689 JDO-690 and JDO-692 about > JDOHelper methods. In process. > > > Craig L Russell > c...@apache.org > -- Michael Bouschen akquinet tech@spree GmbH Bülowstraße 66 • D-10783 Berlin Tel: +49 30 235520-33 Fax: +49 30 217520-12 E-Mail: michael.bousc...@akquinet.de <mailto:michael.bousc...@akquinet.de> Web: www.akquinet.de <http://www.akquinet.de/> Geschäftsführung: Martin Weber, Dr. Torsten Fink Amtsgericht Berlin HRB 86780 • USt.-Id. Nr.: DE 225 964 680 [Facebook] <http://www.facebook.com/akquinet> [XING] <https://www.xing.com/companies/akquinetag> [G+] <https://plus.google.com/b/111054946250796705170/+akquinet/posts> [LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/akquinet-ag> [Twitter] <https://twitter.com/akquinet>
