Here is some specification text to discuss in item 1 of the agenda:

The specification probably belongs in 10.2 Metamodel.
The JDO implementation creates a metamodel class for each persistence capable 
class. The base name of the metamodel class starts with a “Q” (Employee → 
QEmployee) and it has the same package as the persistence capable class. 
The metamodel class provides a public static field for each persistent 
field/property and relationship of the persistence capable class. These static 
fields are used to represent field access in a query. 

Additionally, the metamodel class has the following methods:
public static QClass candidate()
The behavior of this method is identical to candidate("this").

public static QClass candidate(String name)
This method returns a new instance of QClass with the specified name. The name 
may be used in queries.

public static QClass variable(String name)
This method returns a new instance of QClass with the specified name. The name 
may be used in queries.


> On Aug 19, 2024, at 11:42, Michael Bouschen <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We will have our regular meeting Tuesday August 20 1100 PDT 2000 CEST to 
> discuss JDO TCK issues and status.
> 
> We use the following dial-in for audio and video:
> https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87074698575?pwd=bmZXeVV3dVowRHFDWk9KWFdVWjc3dz09
> 
> Agenda:
> 
> 1. JIRA JDO-842 "Q class specification of candidate() method" 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-842
> 
> 2. JIRA JDO-812 "Move to JDK 11 as the lowest supported version" 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-812
> 
> 3. sonarcloud issues
> 
>  * JIRA JDO-819 "Code quality analysis"
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-819
>  * JIRA JDO-823 "Fix sonarcloud issues of type Code Smells"
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-823
>  * Sonarcloud link: https://sonarcloud.io/summary/overall?id=db-jdo
>  * Cognitive Complexity of methods should not be too high:
> https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&rules=java%3AS3776&severities=CRITICAL&types=CODE_SMELL&id=db-jdo
>  
>  * Raw types should not be used:
> https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&rules=java%3AS3740&severities=MAJOR&id=db-jdo
>  
> 
> 4. Other issues
> 
> Action Items from weeks past:
> 
> [Jan 02 2024] AI everyone: see if anyone can see a problem with the parallel 
> execution of tests Cast.java and SupportedOptionalMethods.java
> [Jul 13 2023] AI All Open a new JIRA for Android since having JNDI in the API 
> disallows use with Android
> [Jun 08 2023] AI All make a JIRA: JDO support for Java Records 
> https://openjdk.org/jeps/395
> [Dec 09 2021] AI Craig: Try to contact all current/former participants in JDO 
> development and see if and how they want to be recognized on the JDO and DB 
> web sites.https://db.apache.org/whoweare.html
> [Oct 07 2021] AI Craig send a private message to all JSR-243 Expert Group 
> members asking if they wish to continue.
> [Mar 25 2021] AI Craig: investigate "merging" papajdo and apache.clr accounts
> [Oct 17 2014] AI Matthew any updates for "Modify specification to address 
> NoSQL datastores "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-651
> 

Craig L Russell
c...@apache.org

Reply via email to