[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17894032#comment-17894032
 ] 

Craig L Russell commented on JDO-842:
-------------------------------------

Changes are in github repositories:

[https://github.com/clr-apache/jdo-specification/tree/JDO-842]

[https://github.com/apache/db-jdo/blob/JDO-842/api/src/main/java/javax/jdo/JDOQLTypedQuery.java]

> Q class specification of candidate() method
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JDO-842
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-842
>             Project: JDO
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: specification
>    Affects Versions: JDO 3.2.1
>            Reporter: Tilmann Zäschke
>            Priority: Major
>
> The specification does not clearly specify the behavior of the Q classes in 
> Section "14.10 Typesafe Query Construction"
> The examples in section "14.11 Examples" use the following methods of 
> generated Q-classes:
>  * candidate()
>  * candidate(String)
>  * variable(String)
> Both candidate methods are used in the query examples, but they are not 
> specified as part of the typesafe query support.
> Specific points that we should possibly mention:
>  * These methods should allow Q classes to be used concurrently. 
> Specifically, they should all return *new* instances. The current 
> specification allows returning shared multiple instances which causes 
> problems when used concurrently. (the reference implementation currently does 
> this for 'candidate()').
>  * The reference implementation also has a 'parameter(String)' method. We may 
> want to add this to the spec.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to