Hi Andy,

Just integrated your patch to trunk, svn no 17928.
Thanks :)

-Ghee

On 03/24/09 13:09, Ghee Teo wrote:
> Hi Andras,
>
> Thanks for the patch to fix doo 3402! Great! I need that for 
> gnome-nettol :)
> I do have a little query, in the bug you said
>
> +diff -Naur libgtop-2.26.0.old/sysdeps/solaris/netlist.c 
> libgtop-2.26.0/sysdeps/solaris/netlist.c
> +--- libgtop-2.26.0.old/sysdeps/solaris/netlist.c    2009-03-10 
> 18:28:33.244136476 +0200
> ++++ libgtop-2.26.0/sysdeps/solaris/netlist.c    2009-03-10 
> 18:30:13.828963197 +0200
> +@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
> +
> +     for (ksp = kc->kc_chain; ksp; ksp = ksp->ks_next)
> +     {
> +-        if (strcmp(ksp->ks_class, "net") != 0)
> ++        if (strcmp(ksp->ks_module,"link") != 0)
> +             continue;
> +
>
> Only this is required. But in the final patch you also have
>
> +diff -Naur libgtop-2.26.0.old/sysdeps/solaris/netload.c 
> libgtop-2.26.0/sysdeps/solaris/netload.c
> +--- libgtop-2.26.0.old/sysdeps/solaris/netload.c    2009-03-23 
> 20:02:34.031743396 +0200
> ++++ libgtop-2.26.0/sysdeps/solaris/netload.c    2009-03-23 
> 20:00:36.697284713 +0200
> +@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@
> +     /*
> +      *  chop off the trailing interface
> +      */
> +-    module = strdup( name );
> ++    module = strdup( "link" );
> +     ptr = module + strlen( module ) - 1;
> +     while( (ptr > module) && isdigit( (int) *ptr ) ) {
> +         *ptr = '\0';
> +
>
> Why is this one required?
> I also don't it changed from a variable to a fixed string "link" in 
> this case.
> Any better solution to this patch?
>
> I am happy to integrate this into trunk.
>
> -Ghee
>
>
> On 03/24/09 06:32, Andras Barna wrote:
>> add b.g.o bug number suggested by laca
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Andras 
>> Barna<andras.barna at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> sorry, forgot patch comment
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Andras 
>>> Barna<andras.barna at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>> this should fix bug #3402
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Andy
>>>> http://blog.sartek.net
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Andy
>>> http://blog.sartek.net
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>


Reply via email to