Yes, that is what we do.
Matt Keenan wrote:
>
> - FF3 as default browser for vermillion-devel : +1
>
> I agree with making FF3 the default in our vermillion-devel builds of
> JDS to catch bugs
> etc, this is exactly what the devel build tree is for.... developing
> to HEAD...
>
> - FF3 as default browser for vermillion-stable : -1
>
> Until FF3 is stable and has passed a full set of integration test, I'd
> be slow to make FF3 the
> default for vermillion-stable e.g. nevada. Once it has become stable
> then obviously this
> is the route to take.
>
>
> Matt
>
>
> Dave Lin wrote:
>> FF 3 as default browser: +1
>>
>> The point is "working on trunk", 3.0 is Firefox's "trunk" so far. In
>> this way, we could find bugs earlier and it's much easier to fix them
>> before 3.0 official release. If setting FF2 as default, there is no
>> different between JDS trunk and stable branch for FF.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Dave
>> Brian Lu wrote:
>>> The reason we put FF3 into JDS trunk (vermillion build) is to find out
>>> bugs as early as possible such as the bug you found.
>>>
>>> I think QA has done some pre-integration testing but it can't covers
>>> anything
>>>
>>> Can you tell me which platform do you use? x86 or sparc?
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for your feedback.
>>>
>>> Brian
>>>
>>> Patrick Ale wrote:
>>>> Hi guys and girls,
>>>>
>>>> Just a quick question.. do we really want to make Firefox 3 beta the
>>>> default browser in the JDS trunk? It doesn't seem very stable/useable.
>>>> It crashes as soon as I go to http://www.google.com/gmail for example,
>>>> downloads dont seem to work (I click on a link, get the question
>>>> wheather I want to download the file or open it, I click download and
>>>> then nothing happens).
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
