Patrick:
> You're right (duh). The catch was that the build failed when I was
> building --without gtk-doc. I tried my patch, rebuild, but without
> --without gtk-doc. So it was "fixed".
> Real problem is a missing if-block in the %install area where the
> gtk-doc directory isnt removed when compiling with --without gtk-doc.
>
> I will revert my changes to the prototype and commit the patch
> mentioned below. I also tried to build --with gtk-doc. This still
> works correctly.
Again, I'm confused by this patch. It doesn't look like any other
spec-files use this sort of technique. We should keep all our spec
files (that build gtk-docs) consistent. Not change one to do
something special like this. If this is really needed, we should
add it to all the spec-files that build gtk-docs.
Brian
> --- base-specs/glade.spec (revision 12892)
> +++ base-specs/glade.spec (working copy)
> @@ -85,6 +85,11 @@
> find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name "*.la" -exec rm -f {} ';'
> find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name "*.a" -exec rm -f {} ';'
>
> +%if %{!?_without_gtk_doc:0}%{?_without_gtk_doc:1}
> +rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/gtk-doc
> +%endif
> +
> +
> %clean
> rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
