OK, I will send the SUNWdesktop-other-l10n.spec file for the review.
SUNWdesktop-other-l10n-$lang is fine with me instead.
However a possible concern is people may be confused by the package names,
"what is the '-other' packages against" because we don't deliver any
SUNWdesktop-${foo}-l10n packages.
Thanks for the suggestion.
fujiwara
Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
> Sounds good, although most things there are not desktop
> related. They are delivered by the desktop community though
> so I guess that's okay.
>
> Shall we call the package SUNWdesktop-other-l10n-$lang to refer
> to spec-files-other?
>
> Thanks,
> Laca
>
> On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 12:33 +0900, Takao Fujiwara - Tokyo S/W Center
> wrote:
>
>>I think l10n packages are needed for spec-files-other.
>>
>>spec path: spec-files-other/l10n/SUNWdesktop-tools-l10n.spec
>>Build rule: l10n/*.spec is built at last to get SUNW*-l10n packages.
>>Package names: SUNWdesktop-tools-l10n-$lang
>>po-sun path: spec-files-other/po-sun
>>
>>
>>If it's ok, I'll implement it.
>>
>>Will you start the nightly build?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>fujiwara
>>
>
>
>
