Ghee Teo wrote: > Jedy Wang wrote: >> If we really should move libsexy into one of gnome-base-libs or >> gnome-panel, according to its funcaality, I think gnome-base-libs is >> a better choice. >> >> So my opinion is: >> 1) I prefer to leave libsexy as a seperated package. Personally, I do >> not think putting too may things into a package is a good practice. > If this is what you want to do, should you not also move > libnotify/notification daemon out of gnome-panel? NO, leave this in gnome-panel as it is already there, and is also there for OpenSolaris repositories. >> 2) if we should move libsexy into one existing package, I prefer >> gnome-base-libs. > How do you address the question I raised above for OpenSolaris > repositories scenarios? > (i..e. Possibly of mismatch version of libnotify and libsexy being > installed by user, for example?) > I say no, leave libsexy in it's own package, as it is currently. I really don't know what all the fuss is about. All we are doing is moving an existing SUNW package from spec-files-other into spec-files. Any existing SUNW spec files in spec-files that depend on libsexy should get their dependencies update to reflec to the SUNWlibsexy package (if they do not already have this info).
notificaiton-daemon etc, should not be touched. Matt
