Agreed.
On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 05:04 +0800, Harry Lu wrote:
> libtasn1 is a dependency of gnome-kerying which is part of GNOME. So it
> should be in spec-files, not spec-files-other.
>
> XSane should be in spec-files-other as nothing in spec-file depends on
> it.
>
> So basically, dependencies of packages in spec-files should be in
> spec-files, too, until RE could resolve the build dependency problem
> between spec-files and spec-files-other.
>
> That is also why we moved libsexy from s-f-o to s-f recently as
> libnotify in s-f depends on it.
>
> Harry
>
> On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 11:39 +0800, simon.zheng wrote:
> > Hi Jeff and Laca,
> >
> > I'm a little confused source repository. libtasn1 is a non-GNOME
> > project. Referring to Laca's early statement, it should be moved to
> > spec-files-other rather than spec-files, right? XSane has the same problem.
> >
> > "There is now an additional repository for JDS spec files,
> >
> > spec-files-other:
> > % svn co \
> > svn+ssh://YOUR_ID at svn.opensolaris.org/svn/jds/spec-files-other/trunk \
> > spec-files-other
> >
> > This is intended for packages that are targeted for
> > Nevada and/or Indiana repositories, but which are
> > *not* GNOME community projects, eg Python, dcraw.
> > Specs for GNOME projects (eg projects where the source
> > is downloaded from gnome.org) should be put in the
> > existing "spec-files" repository."
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Simon
> >
> > Jeff Cai wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Only the library is under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
> > > License version 2.1 (see GNU LGPL). The command line tools, self-tests
> > > and build infrastructure are licensed under the GNU General Public
> > > License version 3.0 (see GNU GPL). So I remove all files under /usr/bin.
> > >
> > > Jeff
> > >
> >
>
