Jedy, I think codeina would also go in spec-files-other, if it gets integrated. So I'd prefer to see notify-python in spec-files-other unless there is a particular reason to go in spec-files.
Thanks, - Dermot Jedy Wang wrote: > Hi Dermot, > > Currently, no. But codeina which Brian is working on depends on it. I am > not sure if Brian will put it in to Indiana and if he will put it in to > spec-files. So I decide to put my spec file in spec-files to make sure > there will be no dependency problem in the future. But spec-files-other > is fine to me, if no applications in spec-files will depends on it. > > Regards, > > Jedy > On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 11:33 +0100, Dermot McCluskey wrote: >> Jedy, >> >> Does anything else in spec-files depend on notify-python? >> >> If not, then I think this would be a better fit in >> spec-files-other. >> >> >> - Dermot >> >> >> Jedy Wang wrote: >>> And I propose to put it in spec-files because libnotify is in spec-files >>> too. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Jedy >>> On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 17:53 +0800, Jedy Wang wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Spec file and copyright file for notify-phtyon are attached. Please >>>> review them. >>>> >>>> Notify-python is the python binding for libnotify. It targets to the >>>> next OpenSolaris release. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Jedy >
