> I have a system that have no thread, and usage of the jemalloc are per > process only.
I don't think jemalloc is designed for this situation. Indeed, much of the complexity in jemalloc is around making it fast in a threaded environment. It sounds like jemalloc may be the wrong tool for you to use. On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM, zhu qun-ying <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a system that have no thread, and usage of the jemalloc are per > process only. I don't see anything in the library that I could turn off the > usage of pthread mutex easily without heavily modified the library which I > am afraid I may break something along the way. > > Would you point me to the direction of safely remove any dependency on > pthread and mutex in the code? > > Thanks > > -- > qun-ying > > _______________________________________________ > jemalloc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.canonware.com/mailman/listinfo/jemalloc-discuss > _______________________________________________ jemalloc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.canonware.com/mailman/listinfo/jemalloc-discuss
