On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 06:06:14PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > From: Mike Hommey <m...@glandium.org> > > test/integration/aligned_alloc.c needs it. > --- > include/jemalloc/internal/jemalloc_internal.h.in | 1 - > include/jemalloc/internal/jemalloc_internal_macros.h | 4 ++++ > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/jemalloc/internal/jemalloc_internal.h.in > b/include/jemalloc/internal/jemalloc_internal.h.in > index c9462e5..d9bfadf 100644 > --- a/include/jemalloc/internal/jemalloc_internal.h.in > +++ b/include/jemalloc/internal/jemalloc_internal.h.in > @@ -46,7 +46,6 @@ > typedef intptr_t ssize_t;
This (ssize_t) is also needed in another integration test. It seems convoluted to move that in _macros.h. Jason, how do you think I should handle this? Relatedly, with the 10 patches I just sent (one of which is in the moderation queue because the patch is big), I have two remaining build failures on tests with MSVC: - test/unit/math.c fails to build because of the lack of INFINITY. I haven't found a replacement definition that works in a const array. - test/unit/mq.c fails to build because of the use of nanosleep/timespec. I haven't looked for a replacement yet. As for running tests, the following unit tests crash: - ckh - rtree - tsd They all crash in malloc_tsd_malloc, which is fishy. In integration tests, thread_arena, posix_memalign and aligned_alloc fail with assertions. Haven't looked further. Cheers, Mike _______________________________________________ jemalloc-discuss mailing list jemalloc-discuss@canonware.com http://www.canonware.com/mailman/listinfo/jemalloc-discuss
