what's your license model for Parliament?

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Rob Battle <[email protected]> wrote:
> Parliament implements the Jena graph interface.  Query access to the indexes 
> is provided via ARQ property functions.  Data is added to the indexes via a 
> mechanism that wraps a Jena GraphListeners  In fact, our indexes should be 
> work on non-Parliament graphs, although we do some query optimization that 
> relies on information provided by our Parliament graph.
>
>
> -rob
>
> On Sep 13, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Marco Neumann wrote:
>
>> I've organized a session with Dave Kolas at MIT/ W3C [1] earlier this
>> year and Parliament looks indeed great, it already uses PostGIS for
>> the spatial queries. I am not sure how Parliament relates to the Jena
>> API though.
>>
>> [1] http://www.vimeo.com/23850413
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Rob Battle <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As Dave mentioned, Parliament [1] supports geospatial and temporal 
>>> indexing.  We index data using the geo-owl ontologies [2] for geospatial 
>>> data and OWL time [3] for temporal data (although only ProperIntervals and 
>>> DateTimeIntervals are supported, not DateTimeInstants).  The spatial index 
>>> supports predicates corresponding to RCC-8 and OGC simple features as 
>>> property functions and can use PostGIS or a memory-mapped r-tree as an 
>>> index.
>>>
>>> If you are interested, Parliament also has preliminary support for the 
>>> proposed OGC GeoSPARQL [4] standard for geospatial queries over RDF (note 
>>> that this is different from http://www.geosparql.org).
>>> We also have an unpublished article [5] which describes GeoSPARQL, 
>>> evaluates some existing research/implementations in the geospatial semantic 
>>> web, and describes the GeoSPARQL implementation in Parliament.
>>>
>>> The Parliament geosparql branch is located at [6]
>>>
>>> -rob
>>>
>>> [1] http://parliament.semwebcentral.org
>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/XGR-geo/#owl
>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/
>>> [4] http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=44722
>>> [5] 
>>> http://semwebcentral.org/scm/viewvc.php/*checkout*/branches/geosparql/paper/swjarticle.pdf?root=parliament
>>> [6] https://projects.semwebcentral.org/svn/parliament/branches/geosparql  
>>> (username/password anonsvn)
>>>
>>> On Sep 13, 2011, at 8:17 AM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
>>>
>>>> There is also Parliament [1] which offers both geospatial and temporal
>>>> indexing graphs.
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://parliament.semwebcentral.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 13:08 +0100, Paolo Castagna wrote:
>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>> great to hear that, you are welcome.
>>>>>
>>>>> Something similar using Lucene Spatial capabilities instead of
>>>>> a proper GIS is here (it's just a less than two days hack):
>>>>> https://github.com/castagna/GeoARQ
>>>>>
>>>>> I was planning to post something along the lines of "making
>>>>> easier to plug LARQ or similar into ARQ", but unfortunately I do
>>>>> not a good idea (yet).
>>>>>
>>>>> It would be good to enable third parties to add their own property
>>>>> functions (that's possible) which use custom indexes and need to
>>>>> update those indexes as triples/quads are added/removed to the
>>>>> underlying RDF store.
>>>>>
>>>>> More on this later, in the meantime: welcome.
>>>>>
>>>>> Paolo
>>>>>
>>>>> Alexander Dutton wrote:
>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We've currently got a lot of (simple) geospatial data in
>>>>>> <http://data.clarosnet.org/> (served behind the scenes by Fuseki).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We'd like to do some geospatial indexing magic, and were wondering
>>>>>> about writing something a bit like LARQ that will pull out things like
>>>>>> geo:Points and WKT literals, place them in a PostGIS-flavoured DB, and
>>>>>> then implements something like GeoSPARQL (<http://geosparql.org/>).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Has anyone started doing this or something similar? I'm happy to give
>>>>>> it a go and I'm sure my employer would be happy to contribute it back
>>>>>> to Jena and the ASF. My plan was to go through the LARQ codebase to
>>>>>> work out how it hooks itself in, and use that as a model.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yours,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - --
>>>>>> Alexander Dutton
>>>>>> Metamorphoses Project Developer, Claros
>>>>>> Oxford University Computing Services, ℡ 01865 (6)13483
>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>>>>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> iEYEARECAAYFAk5vQbgACgkQS0pRIabRbjC9QACfTZtTcFIhDXjWPR+MpEWunKkt
>>>>>> 38oAnR5n+oi1nuTZAfRdOrF2mcOac2Ck
>>>>>> =r1dj
>>>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Marco Neumann
>> KONA
>>
>> ---
>> Join us at the Semantic Web Media Summit in New York City for an
>> exciting event on 14 September 2011
>> http://www.lotico.com/evt/swmsNYC2011/
>
>



-- 
Marco Neumann
KONA

---
Join us at the Semantic Web Media Summit in New York City for an
exciting event on 14 September 2011
http://www.lotico.com/evt/swmsNYC2011/

Reply via email to