On 22/09/11 14:05, Dave Reynolds wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 12:04 +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote:
It turns out I'd been more efficient than I remembered. There are
already text files in Jena, ARQ and other places e.g.

http://jena.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jena/ARQ/trunk/MOVED%20TO%20APACHE.txt

I didn't get a sense of which option people thought was best.

Three choices:

1/ Delete the repository trees.  Leave one text file.  Need to use
history browsing to see anything. Will very noticeably alert anyone with
a copy currently checked out.  (Paolo's first suggestion)

2/ Leave for browsing but delete the build files and other stuff to stop
accidental build and use.   (Paolo's second suggestion)

3/ Have a "Jena has moved" file as now, maybe with a longer content than
is currently there. (current situation)

I have a very mild preference for #3, i.e. leave it as is.

[That way a developer who using an old version still has easy access to
the corresponding sources including via browse.]

That's true for (2) as well - the sources are browsable without diving into history.

The difference is that checkout-maven without looking at the file does not work in (2) but does in (3).

        Andy


But would be happy with any of those three.

Dave



Reply via email to