[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-62?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114553#comment-13114553
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-62:
-----------------------------------
LARQ removed from ARQ.
I'm still unclear about documentation and examples for LARQ, and how LARQ is
going to distributed, e.g. separate zip down, in ARQ zip? other?
> Remove LARQ from ARQ
> --------------------
>
> Key: JENA-62
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-62
> Project: Jena
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: ARQ, LARQ
> Reporter: Paolo Castagna
> Assignee: Paolo Castagna
>
> LARQ (as well as the Lucene dependency) needs to be removed from ARQ.
> ARQ will use the separate LARQ module.
> Since LARQ depends on Lucene and ARQ and we cannot have cycles in our
> dependency graph, ARQ cannot depend on LARQ.
> LARQ is a sort of plug-in for ARQ and we could load it and wire it in into
> ARQ if present in the classpath, in a similar way as showed here:
> http://markmail.org/thread/r5phyiuqkqsyi2xc
> Should we change the namespace for the property function?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
