On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Andy Seaborne <andy.seabo...@epimorphics.com> wrote: > Context: "Eyeball" is the jena application that is "lint for RDF". It > checks RDF graphs for common and easy-to-make mistakes. > > http://incubator.apache.org/jena/documentation/tools/eyeball-getting-started.html > > While the code in Apache SVN has had the sourcecode headers upgraded, it > hasn't been generally sorted up into a release able condition. And of > course everything is in the Import/ area. > > > As far as I aware, no one has plans to release in the near future. > > Eyeball currently is downloadable from SourceForge. Last release was > 2010-04. > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/jena/files/Eyeball/Eyeball%202.3/ > > It hasn't been updated in while, so it depends on non-Apache Jena. > > Eyeball has various plug-ins so the licensing on auxiliary jars needs to be > chased down and documented. The tests don't run from ant (but do in Eclipse > - bizarre). I ran out of time tracking licenses on some very old jars where > the license at the time was not obvious. > It would be easier to update the jars to newer ones. > > I'd like to move from the main area of SVN into (for example), /Scratch, add > some README/LICENS/NOTICE labelling and wait for the time when someone > applies care and attention on it. > > Should we also delete the jars that are checked in because of the license > unclarity? (They'd still be in Imports/ and we can leave notes.
Don't put any jars of unclear license in the main svn area. Putting it in /Scratch or /sandbox or whatever is fine. I might make some time to neaten it up for you. > > What should go on the website temporarily? I think we either need to remove > the page or (better?) put a header on the top of the Eyeball pages to point > to SF and explain the license. > > Andy
