[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13268493#comment-13268493
]
Paolo Castagna commented on JENA-242:
-------------------------------------
> Just because the scores aren't normalized doesn't mean a user won't want to
> limit by the score
In my opinion, offering the feature of 'limiting matches by score' => use of
'normalized scores'.
If scores are not normalized how you are supposed to know which value to set?
42? 8? 3? 2.5?
It depends on the query as well... and on the data, you delete a document, same
query, scores will be different.
> LARQ scores not normalized
> --------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-242
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-242
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: LARQ
> Affects Versions: LARQ 1.0.0
> Environment: Fuseki
> Reporter: laotao
>
> In previous versions the LARQ score seemed to be normalized to range [0, 1].
> In LARQ 1.0.0 some scores can be higher than 1.
> Normalized scores are needed to filter sparql results (so that only items
> above certain quality is shown).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
