On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 31/01/11 19:36, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >> This call: >> >> TDBLoader.load(tdbGraph, uncompressed, false); >> >> on a stream of nquads, seems to be considerably faster than the >> tdbloader2 command. > > How much data?
633574 > > TDBLoader.load is calling the core of tdbloader1 I had trouble working out how to get 'tdbloader' to eat a file of nquads. > > tdbloader2 is comparable or slower than tdbloader1 for 100K's of triples > because it's exec'ing external processes. What's more, TDBLoader.load does > not incur all the classloading overhead because it's already been done. > > Andy >
