On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 08/02/11 15:23, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >> Hmm. This works fine in CXF. Do you all care enough to put more effort >> into avoiding the extra buffer? > > Is the STaX parser is CXF using? > > I tried upgrading to woodstox 4.1.1 and (stil using the STaX API) get the > same problem. > > recoding (only in XMLInputStAX?) to use STaX2 might be an option.
I don't think that's relevant. The main CXF data path does just what's giving you trouble, using the plain STaX API. > > Andy >
