----- Original Message -----
> From:Andy Seaborne <[email protected]>
> To:[email protected]
> Cc:
> Sent:Wednesday, February 9, 2011 1:21 AM
> Subject:Re: schema for TDB
>
> I think Tim means the additions for dataset assemblers (ARQ) and specifically
> for TDB.
>
> Tim - no, there aren't schemas (and there should be). The examples in
> Joseki are complete illustrations of the ARQ dataset additions.
>
The schema below is useful, thanks. Mostly I just wanted to see what is the
extent of changes made by TDB (cause I will need to do similarly ).
( suggest someone who is a committer make a quick copy paste into a file into
the TDB sources... )
> http://openjena.org/wiki/TDB/Assembler
>
> tdb:Dataset a rdfs:Class .
> tdb:GraphTDB a rdfs:Class .
>
> tdb:DatasetTDB rdfs:subClassOf ja:RDFDataset .
> tdb:GraphTDB rdfs:subClassOf ja:Model .
>
> tdb:location a rdf:Property ;
> # domain is tdb:Dataset or tdb:GraphTDB
> # The range is simple literal
> .
>
> tdb:unionDefaultGraph a rdf:Property ;
> rdfs:domain tdb:Dataset ;
> # The range is xsd:boolean
> .
>
> tdb:graphName a rdf:Property ;
> rdfs:domain tdb:GraphTDB ;
> # range is a URI
> .
> Andy
>
> On 09/02/11 08:21, Chris Dollin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 09, 2011 12:54:45 am Tim Harsch wrote:
> >> but until then... do they exist in SVN or something?
> >
> > Ian had said:
> >
> >> Yes, it's in $JENA_ROOT/vocabularies/assembler.n3, where JENA_ROOT
> >> is the root of your Jena download. I'm not sure there's a
> web-accessible copy at the moment.
> >
> > So yes, assembler.n3 (which at some point should be renamed to
> > assembler.ttl) is in SVN.
( sheepish grin ). I missed that line of Ian's reply
> >
> >>> But http://jena.hpl.hp.com/2008/tdb# is not dereferencable.
> >> Yes, sadly we lost control of that server when we left HP.
> >
> > And in fact I don't think we ever had it accessible under that URI
> > anyway. Future opportunities ...
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > (Also the subject is "schema for TDB" but we're actually
> talking about
> > "schema for assembler specs", which may make a difference ...)
... and I conflated the two. Yes, I am interested in both assembler specs and
TDB.
> >
