Thanks Bob. Will take a look at it. - Anuj
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Bob DuCharme <[email protected]> wrote: > >is it better to go with SPARQL queries or Jena Inference mechanism? > > You might want to look into SPIN, which provides a way to implement rules > using SPARQL CONSTRUCT and ASK queries: http://www.spinrdf.org/ > > Bob > > > On 3/26/2011 1:18 PM, Anuj Kumar wrote: > >> Hello Everyone, >> >> I am trying some basic inferencing with Jena 2 Inference support and >> following the tutorial given here: http://jena.sourceforge.net/inference/ >> >> There are some basic inferencing regarding the property of a resource and >> its sub property in my TDB instance. I have loaded a set of triples into >> TDB >> and I am creating a model from the TDBFactory using the TDB database >> location. The basic inferencing is taking longer time as compared to >> SPARQL >> queries. I have limited RAM of 2GB and just trying to compare the two >> approaches. >> >> What exactly is a better approach to do such inferencing? Also if you have >> your own custom rules, is it better to go with SPARQL queries or Jena >> Inference mechanism? >> >> Any thoughts/suggestion will be of great help. >> >> Also, if this is the right place; there is a small typo in 3rd line of >> http://jena.sourceforge.net/inference/#RDFSintro -> or manually via * >> ReasonerRegistery*.getRDFSReasoner() should be *ResonerRegistry*. Same >> change is required in first line of >> http://jena.sourceforge.net/inference/#OWLconfiguration >> >> Thanks, >> Anuj >> >>
