After further investigation I found that the problem seems to be due to the use of <br/>
If I insert the following triple: ex:Item dc:description "First Line<br/>Second Line"^^<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral> the RDF returned by the endpoint is <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.com/Item";> <dc:description rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral";>First Line<br/>Second Line</dc:description> </rdf:Description> However, if I insert this triple: ex:Item dc:description "First Line<br></br>Second Line"^^<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral> then the RDF returned uses rdf:parseType="Literal", like so: <rdf Description rdf:about="http://example.com/Item";> <dc:description rdf:parseType="Literal">First Line<br></br>Second Line</dc:description> </rdf:Description> I will just need to write a regex to identify when users input tags like <br/> and expand them into <br></br> Thanks, Evan On Apr 11, 2011, at 6:35 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 10/04/11 09:09, Dave Reynolds wrote: >> On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 22:45 -0400, Evan Patton wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm having some issues with SPARQL/Update support in ARQ using Jena >>> 2.6.4 and Joseki 3.4.3. I obtain query results in N3 format from >>> the endpoint using a DESCRIBE query and the results include some >>> XMLLiterals specified using the ^^ syntax. However, if I attempt to >>> load these files using a LOAD query, all of the< and> characters >>> are encoded as< and> and when queried using the DESCRIBE no >>> longer make sense to other tools. First, is this the expected >>> behavior for loading XML Literals? >> >> No, that's not normal, at least at the level of basic N3 (well >> Turtle) parsing it's not. For example: >> >> modelFromN3(":r :p '<a>foo</a>'^^rdf:XMLLiteral .") >> .write(System.out, "RDF/XML-ABBREV"); >> >> generates >> >> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"; >> xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"; >> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"; >> xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"; >> xmlns="http://jena.hpl.hp.com/eg#";> <rdf:Description >> rdf:about="http://jena.hpl.hp.com/eg#r";> <p >> rdf:parseType="Literal"><a>foo</a></p> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> >> >> No quoting of< >. >> >> Is the XMLLiteral syntax correct? Can you try using jena.rdfcat to >> check that the source data can be correctly parsed. >> >> Dave > > It should work - do you have a complete, minimal example or what your trying? > > Andy > > > -- > BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 40717954) is spam: > Spam: http://respite.rpi.edu/b.php?c=s&i=40717954&m=0c706edea997 > Not spam: http://respite.rpi.edu/b.php?c=n&i=40717954&m=0c706edea997 > Forget vote: http://respite.rpi.edu/b.php?c=f&i=40717954&m=0c706edea997 > ------------------------------------------------------ > END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS > >
