Sent from my iPhone
On 6 May 2011, at 19:10, Tim Harsch <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I wrote a query like this and sent it through Fuseki 0.1.0. It came back > with > results for "?n0 ?n1 ?nc" and dropped the other variables. > > SELECT ?n0 ?n1 (COUNT(*) as ?nc) ?n2 ?n3 ?n4 ?n5 ?n6 > WHERE { > ... > } GROUP BY ?n0 ?n1 > > Its probably by design, but its confusing to me because in analogous SQL I > believe the behavior would be to calculate the ?nc result but return all > rows, > its just that the aggregrate count would be the same for any row where ?n0 or > ?n1 has been previously returned. > > Does the SPARQL spec define the behavior here, or is up to implementors? > > Thanks, > Tim Sparql spec defines it that way. Damian
