Hi Baptiste Baptiste Lafontaine wrote: > 2011/12/6 Paolo Castagna <[email protected]> >>> As small as possible. For testing purpose I may use the full version >>> although. >> "small" is the size in bytes or the number of classes you have in a jar or >> the numbers of lines of code? > > I ment in size in bytes. But finally this solution was not good > enough, so I'll use something else.
Can I ask you why the size in bytes matter to you? Re: "this solution was not good enough": I imagine. If you need to start the JVM for each transformation|request, it is not going to work well. A better approach would be to write a small server which than you can use from node.js via HTTP. This way you do not need to pay the JVM startup cost (but it is a slightly more complicate setup). If you find an interesting solution to parse RDF/XML in JavaScript let us/me know. I am not aware of any (but I use Turtle and N-Triples|N-Quads). > Thanks for your help anyway No problem. Paolo > > >> Paolo >> >>>> Paolo >>>> >>>>> Thanks a lot >>>>> -- >>>>> Baptiste Lafontaine >>>>> Etudiant Télécom SudParis >>>>> CV : http://magnetik.org/fr/curriculum-vitae/ >>>>> Mobile : +33 (0) 6 75 30 15 33 >>>>>
