On 22/01/12 22:05, Benson Margulies wrote:
Do you really mean subPropertyOf and not subClassof?
The twoidoms are:
?s rdf:type ?t .
?t rdfs:subClassOf* :T
or ?s rdf:type/rdfs:subClassOf* :T .
and
?s ?p ?o .
?p rdfs:subPropertyOf* :P .
I happen to have a little tree of properties. These are named entity
types. I thought I wanted + because a zero-length path of them means
'not one of these.' I've been running this for a very long time
successfully.
But rdf:type + properties is unusual.
The object of rdf:type is ... a class.
The subject of rdfs:subPropertyOf is ... a property.
Andy
