Ah, sorry, misread your previous mail re stage 3 queries. No, the number of queries at this point doesn't seem to make any difference, as long as the PUT has finished.
On 2 Apr 2012, at 19:37, Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 02/04/12 19:33, Bill Roberts wrote: >> Hi Andy >> On 2 Apr 2012, at 14:23, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> >>> Hi Bill, >>> >>> Sorry for the delay in replying. It was too sunny. >>> >> >> No problem! I am all for appreciating a bit of sunniness when the chance >> presents itself. >>> >>> Please add it to JIRA. >> >> Will do. >> >>> >>> There's nothing I can see that >>> >>> (how much RAM?) >> >> 16 GB on the server for the problems that I reported last week. 2GB on my >> Mac where this specific test was run (and a fair bit of that used by other >> software). >> >>> >>> big.ttl is the imd-2010-imd-score.ttl file? >>> >> I've tried it with a few different files (including that one) - same effect >> with each. >> >>> >>> Does it have to be 2 queries at stage 3? Does one have the same effect? >>> None? >> >> Just tested a bit more: with a single query during the PUT, it worked >> correctly 4 out of 5 times and failed once. With two queries during the >> PUT, the problem occurred in all tests (tried about 10 times with 3 >> different 'big' files). > > stage 3 is the queries after little the PUT - I'm guessing these make no > difference if little PUT has finished. > > Andy > > >> >> Thanks very much >> >> Bill >> >
