Rodrigo, I think we address the problem by loading each ontology on a separate graph while doing search, and eventually reasoning, by instantiating an appropriate Model on the "urn:x-arq:UnionGraph".
Regards, Milorad >________________________________ > From: Rodrigo Jardim <rod...@gmail.com> >To: jena-users@incubator.apache.org >Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 9:19 PM >Subject: Re: Mapping Ontologies > >Hi Paolo, >Yes my ontologies are OWL ontologies. I've another doubt refer to >perform semantic search into these two ontologies (A and B), where each >ontology(A and B) have different vocabulary and >I need to perform reasoning. >I think that I need create an intermediate ontology, where ontologyA + >ontologyB = ontologyC, and I will store ontologyC into TDB store. >Later I will do searches over ontologyC. > > >Thanks Paolo . > >-- >Rodrigo > >Em 05/04/2012 15:17, Paolo Castagna escreveu: >> Hi Rodrigo >> >> Rodrigo Jardim wrote: >>> Hello, >>> I have two ontologies (A and B), and I'd like to do a mapping them. So, >>> it's possible store two ontologies into TDB Store ? >> If your ontologies are OWL ontologies (which at the end of the day are >> RDF), you can store them in TDB and if you prefer you can keep them >> separate in two named graphs. >> >> Documentation is here: >> http://incubator.apache.org/jena/documentation/tdb/datasets.html >> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#specifyingDataset >> >>> I've studied Ontologies Matching, but I'd like know opinions experts >>> about how to resolve this problem. >> Your seems an interesting problem, is this a University assignment or >> you need this for a specific/real use case? >> How big are the ontologies you are trying to match? >> How will you evaluate how good is your matching solution? >> >> I am not an expert on this, just curious. :-) >> >> Thanks, >> Paolo >> >>> Thanks >>> >>> -- >>> Rodrigo >>> > > > >
