Saya tak faham kenapa Encik Asid ni marah2. Email tu cuma menerangkan jika dibiarkan potongan 8%, maka kena bayar lebih income-tax. Maksudnya, bila keluar borang nanti, cepat2 pergi isi.
Yang bahagian Encik Asid kata "ni utk org yg pendapatan rendah", saya lagi tak faham. Adakah maksudnya potongan 8% itu utk yg berpendapatan rendah sahaja? Silalah terangkan, terima kasih. - TokMod --- In [email protected], asid eaddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ala..dh dasar kaya kedekot betol..em...kalu dh gaji besor tu..xpayah la gatal2 nk buat camtu.. ni utk org yg pendapatan rendah...adoi tu pon xpaham ke... > > --- On Thu, 11/20/08, zuraida mohd ibrahim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: zuraida mohd ibrahim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [(jdk)] Fw: [kelakarnyer] EPF 8% Means Paying More Income Tax ( For High Income Group ) > To: "poobalan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "selvi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "mohd rizal baharom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected] > Date: Thursday, November 20, 2008, 3:20 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Forwarded Message ---- > From: shah ril <slumber90210@ yahoo.com> > To: zuraida mohd ibrahim <nuareda_19may@ yahoo.com> > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 2:29:08 PM > Subject: Fw: [kelakarnyer] EPF 8% Means Paying More Income Tax ( For High Income Group ) > > > > > > > > ----- Forwarded Message ---- > From: siti mazniza zainul idris <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> > To: kelakarnyer@ yahoogroups. com > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 8:16:29 PM > Subject: [kelakarnyer] EPF 8% Means Paying More Income Tax ( For High Income Group ) > > > > > > > > > > ----- Forwarded Message ---- > From: "SitiMazniza_ ZainulIdris@ ameron.com. my" <SitiMazniza_ ZainulIdris@ ameron.com. my> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] com > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 4:40:05 PM > Subject: Fw: EPF 8% Means Paying More Income Tax ( For High Income Group ) > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Siti Mazniza Zainul Idris > Piping Engineer > Ameron Malaysia - TSG > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---- > CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT > > This electronic message transmission contains information from Ameron Pte Ltd is confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this eletronic transmission in error, please notify us by telephone (+60-7-5984962) immediately. > > ----- Forwarded by SitiMazniza ZainulIdris/ AMERON/SG on 11/19/2008 04:40 PM ----- > > > > > Azlina Isa/AMERON/SG > 11/19/2008 04:38 PM > > > > > > To > Yuhana Kassim/AMERON/ [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mardiana Yatim/AMERON/ [EMAIL > PROTECTED], Norainon Rahman/AMERON/ [EMAIL PROTECTED], NorAzlina MohdJadi/AMERON/ [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nur_Al_Faezah Mohamed/AMERON/ [EMAIL PROTECTED], NorShafeeza MohdAli/AMERON/ SG, Juliana Jaafar/AMERON/ [EMAIL PROTECTED], AhmadHelmy AbdulHamid/AMERON/ [EMAIL PROTECTED], Norizwan BinSulaiman/ AMERON/SG@ AMERON, Azmi Abd Hamid/AMERON/ [EMAIL PROTECTED], Asslah Adnan/AMERON/ [EMAIL PROTECTED], SitiMazniza ZainulIdris/ AMERON/SG@ AMERON, Salwani MohamedNawi/ AMERON/SG@ AMERON > > > cc > > > > > Subject > Fw: EPF 8% Means Paying More Income Tax ( For High Income Group ) > > > > > > > > > > > Mmg betul pun..... > > > fyi > > > English Translation : > > Assume monthly basic salary is RM4000. > - If your monthly EPF contribution is 11% ( RM440 ), taxable income = RM3560, income tax payable = RM77. > - If your monthly EPF contribution is 8% ( RM320 ), taxable income = RM3680, income tax payable = RM109. > > Conclusion : If you choose to contribute 8%, you will end up paying more income tax to the government, > which will make the government richer. Finance Minister Najib said this measure is meant > to boost up the slow-down market, but from this example wee see that the money does not > go into the market. Instead the money goes direct into the government's pocket through > the greater amount of income tax that we will have to pay. Obviously this measure does not > help the market at all. Do we still want this kind of government that doesn't have the best interest > of the people in mind? > > > > >
