Can anyone have a look at the pull request of Vincent? We struggle each day with this issue.
Regards, Cees On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Paul Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: > Super! Thanks. > -P > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Vincent Latombe > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've made a fix for this, just waiting to be merged : > > https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/419 > > > > Vincent > > > > > > > > 2012/3/28 Daniel Tkatch <[email protected]> > >> > >> here is a JIRA that looks connected: > >> https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12994 > >> > >> On Mar 27, 3:29 pm, Paul Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > After upgrading I have several jobs in queues that are just not > >> > dequeuing. > >> > If they are tied jobs the tooltip says "Waiting for next executor on > >> > <tie-expression>". If they are untied jobs the tooltip says "Waiting > >> > for > >> > next executor". > >> > > >> > I have executors available, both for the tied and untied jobs, but > they > >> > are > >> > not being scheduled. I've tried disconnecting and reconnecting the > >> > slaves, > >> > and adding and removing the executor count. Nothing works. > >> > > >> > Sometimes if I delete an unrelated slave, everything will wake up and > >> > the > >> > jobs get scheduled. But right now, my farm is very inefficient. > >> > > >> > The only relevant changse that I can see in the logs, that touches > >> > queues, > >> > are these: > >> > > >> > Fixed a bug in executor/queue filtering for matrix projects. (pull > >> > 394<https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/394> > >> > ) > >> > > >> > Fixed bug where a queued build could start while the previous build > was > >> > still in its post production state. > > > > >
