There is a difference of opinion on this. I say Freestyle is your only man
KK says Maven 2/3 is great (KK wrote it originally) Olivier says Maven 3 works (Olivier added the Maven 3 support) It might be a matter of personal preference... Though despite their many efforts KK & Olivier have been unable to convince me that Maven 2/3 project types work *every* time... I say 90-95% of the time they are fine, but when they go bad they go spectacularly bad (i.e. trying to figure out what the build is doing is next nor near impossible as it does not behave the same as executing it yourself from the CLI) DISCLOSURE: KK & I both work for CloudBees who provide Jenkins as a Service in the cloud among other things. Olivier & I are both on the Apache Maven Project Management Committee and committers to the Maven project. On 25 July 2012 15:46, Jan Ruzicka <[email protected]> wrote: > Nice article > Isn't there a factual mistake? > I was under the impression that Maven 2/3 builds are now discouraged in > favor of freestyle jobs with maven build steps. > Can anybody clarify? > > Thank you > Jan > > On Jul 25, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Marina Sprava wrote: > > > How to use Jenkins in the cloud > > > http://blog.jelastic.com/2012/07/25/continuous-integration-in-the-cloud-part-ii-jenkins/ > > Jan Ruzicka > Senior Software Engineer > Comtech Mobile Datacom Corporation > 20430 Century Blvd, Germantown, MD 20874 > Office: 240-686-3300 > Fax: 240-686-3301 > > The information contained in this message may be privileged and/or > confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, or responsible for > delivering this message to the intended recipient, any review, forwarding, > dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication or any > attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in > error, please so notify the sender immediately, and delete it and all > attachments from your computer and network. > >
