On Wednesday 17 April 2013 20:52:33 Stephen Connolly wrote: > From my analysis of the code paths the issue is in both 0.23 and 0.24. But > if you think otherwise I would be happy to re-review
no, I just used information provided in JIRA that problem appeared after upgrade from 0.23 to 0.24, so here I would trust you and I bumped the version to 0.25 So, I guess that's all and we are ready for RC.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
