> I can think of several bugs off the top of my head which will be prime > candidates for 1.509.3 once fixed in trunk. So long as vjuranek is willing > to produce new LTS versions I see no harm in sticking to the “train” model.
yes, this is intended (to produce another minor LTS). IIRC we chose 1.509 as a base line for LTS with awareness that it contains bugs and we will produce minor versions more often to included as much fixes as possible. Therefore I also wanted to do an exception and backport fixes regardless they are already in mail release line or not, but Kohsuke had different opinion [1] (and as I hadn't any strong opinion on this, I agreed to backport only soaked fixes) [1] http://meetings.jenkins-ci.org/jenkins/2013/jenkins.2013-05-15-18.00.log.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
