Funny. It is both convention and consideration for users that the developers making changes document the changes.
I think I'll revoke my funny label. It seems more reckless or callous to not document changes for a plugin used by over 70k known deployments. Probably 2 or 3x that number of lurking iceberg installations as well. And if you yourself are willing to casually joke about how you think the changes are so large that they would require more/better -rc releases, and yet were egged on by your CB friends to do so in spite of your better judgement, ..well.. It doesn't look good, but worse, it is deliberately obscurant. On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> wrote: > Go for it > > > On Saturday, February 1, 2014, jieryn <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Is the wiki going to be updated with the changes? >> >> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Stephen Connolly >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > all voted me down and suggest that we just go and release the 2.0 >> > version. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Jenkins Developers" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > -- > Sent from my phone > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
