Hi, few more comments: first, you maybe wonder why another build-in servlet container, as Kohsuke did the migration to Jetty more than half year ago. Jakub enrolled his thesis on the university at the beginning of October (IIRC same week when Kohsuke announced switch to Jetty) and after that it would be quite difficult to completely change the topics already approved by the university, so he decided to continue with this topic (btw: I wasn't thesis supervisor, just an adviser)
> Do you think your 8 minutes of testing got past the compilation threshold > of 10,000 method invocations not sure what Jakub used for testing, but on my laptop I get about 1,500 iterations per minute, so I would say it's not sufficient for JIT. On the other hand, do you think JIT would have any significant impact? IMHO server internal stuff (async. request processing, any kind of caching, thread pooling etc.) has much bigger impact > https://github.com/jbartece/undertow4jenkins/blob/master/thesis/tex/projekt. > pdf?raw=true FIY: this is not a text of the thesis, I already asked Jakub to write a blog post and sum up performance results there > Is > the measured speedup mostly related to serving static resources, or > better general stream handling, or something else? AFAIK it wasn't investigated into such details - main subject of the thesis was migration to Undertow. To have answers for these questions (and really reliable comparison), much in-depth analysis and perf. testing needs to be done IMHO Vojta
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
