The repo has been forked:
https://github.com/jenkinsci/matrix-groovy-execution-strategy-plugin 

четверг, 23 октября 2014 г., 12:44:10 UTC+4 пользователь Jeremy Marshall 
написал:
>
> I think the plugin can be forked, but it's better to agree on the plugin 
>>> name before forking.
>>>
>>  
>         I renamed the plugin to 
> https://github.com/JeremyMarshall/matrix-groovy-execution-strategy-plugin 
>
>>
>>>    - What about using http://groovy-sandbox.kohsuke.org/ to run Groovy 
>>>    scripts? Just to avoid new security holes...
>>>    
>>>                  I'll look into this and add it before release 
>
>>
>>>    - 
>>>    - > "I think the name could be better "
>>>    - Definitely. Actually, you don't introduce new project types
>>>       - I'd propose to use a name like matrix-groovy-execution-strategy 
>>>       (and to name GitHub repo accordingly)
>>>       - If you don't actually need to manage the execution order, see 
>>>       below
>>>       - > "I'd like to move the combination filter box into the default 
>>>    plugin box if possible"
>>>    - There's no extension points for this field    
>>>    
>>>                               The combination filter is only used in the 
> default implementation - I think its here for legacy reasons
>  final FilterScript combinationFilter = FilterScript.parse(execution.
> getProject().getCombinationFilter(), FilterScript.ACCEPT_ALL);
>  
>                             from 
> src/main/java/hudson/matrix/DefaultMatrixExecutionStrategyImpl.java 
> <https://github.com/jenkinsci/matrix-project-plugin/blob/f6656ca75c3f2f222a3f94e6b1ebd704f3c1c76d/src/main/java/hudson/matrix/DefaultMatrixExecutionStrategyImpl.java>
>  
>
>                             I'm not sure if its possible or desirable to 
> move it to the default plugin and have a migration strategy (I'll 
> investigate)
>
>>
>>>    -  
>>>    
>>>
>>>    - If somebody implements it, you will be able to reduce the scope of 
>>>       the plugin (and probably rename it)
>>>       
>>>                              I was hoping to have one place to filter 
> out combinations you don't want in addition to structuring the execution so 
> possibly the executers don't get                              swamped 
>
>>
>>>    - 
>>>    - > "I wrote it with the gradle-jpi-plugin in groovy"
>>>    - A Maven spec wrapper could be useful for automatic Pull Request 
>>>       Builder in jenkinsci org (not sure if it supports Gradle now)
>>>    
>>>                           If this happens for the job-dsl plugin then it 
> should be possible
>
>                     I'll also add in a facility to just use a list of 
> capabilities for simpler cases
>
> Thanks 
> Jeremy 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to