Summary from the project meeting on Nov 12th (
http://meetings.jenkins-ci.org/jenkins/2014/jenkins.2014-11-12-19.04.html).

*Decision on further component renames in Jira* (kohsuke__
<http://meetings.jenkins-ci.org/jenkins/2014/jenkins.2014-11-12-19.04.log.html#l-7>,
19:05:48)

   1. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jenkinsci-dev/T_V9Z71rbPk (
   kohsuke__
   
<http://meetings.jenkins-ci.org/jenkins/2014/jenkins.2014-11-12-19.04.log.html#l-10>,
   19:06:17)
   2. https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/JMeter+Plugin (kohsuke__
   
<http://meetings.jenkins-ci.org/jenkins/2014/jenkins.2014-11-12-19.04.log.html#l-19>,
   19:09:06)
   3. *AGREED*: the list he has looks good to us. Fire away (kohsuke__
   
<http://meetings.jenkins-ci.org/jenkins/2014/jenkins.2014-11-12-19.04.log.html#l-24>,
   19:11:45)
   4. *IDEA*: Plugin masthead in Wiki should land to the component page
   like
   
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS/component/15803#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Acomponent-issues-panel
   (kohsuke__
   
<http://meetings.jenkins-ci.org/jenkins/2014/jenkins.2014-11-12-19.04.log.html#l-39>,
   19:16:00)

Best regards,
Oleg Nenashev

2014-11-13 2:05 GMT+03:00 Kanstantsin Shautsou <[email protected]>:

> Does UC has some rpm Obsolete & Epoch tags analog?
>
> On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 9:09:52 PM UTC+3, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>>
>> If Jenkins ever gets a good solution for plugin renaming, then perhaps
>>> the name of the plugin could be revisited... but just not before a
>>> significant proportion of the community have versions of Jenkins that would
>>> be ok with a plugin rename.
>>
>> However, there's a risk of naming clashes in several cases.
>>
>> As example, we have "metadata-plugin" and "google-metadata-plugin".
>> Essentially they're different plugins with almost similar names and IMO
>> similar functionality. I'm not sure how to resolve the naming issue in such
>> case without a company prefix. Probably, Robert Sandell and Matt Moor agree
>> to just merge them (needs a separate discussion)
>>
>> My proposals:
>>
>>    1. Explicitly display JIRA component IDs in plugin-info-macro on Wiki
>>    2. Leave the decision regarding company prefixes to plugin owners
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Oleg Nenashev
>>
>> 2014-11-11 20:40 GMT+03:00 Stephen Connolly <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> Well it was our plugin, but we open sourced it and it now belongs to the
>>> community
>>>
>>> There would have been a host of issues with the existing installations
>>> if we renamed it, so it was simpler to keep the existing name.
>>>
>>> If Jenkins ever gets a good solution for plugin renaming, then perhaps
>>> the name of the plugin could be revisited... but just not before a
>>> significant proportion of the community have versions of Jenkins that would
>>> be ok with a plugin rename.
>>>
>>> On 11 November 2014 17:28, Daniel Beck <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11.11.2014, at 14:14, Ulli Hafner <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Maybe we should also remove the prefix cloudbees from the folders
>>>> plugin. It took me a while to find the component in Jira…
>>>>
>>>> That's part of the plugin name everywhere (display name, short name,
>>>> repo, component), so I'd be surprised if there was nobody looking for the
>>>> plugin _with_ that prefix.
>>>>
>>>> Different from Jenkins/Hudson/CI it's also not redundant in the context
>>>> of Jenkins CI. (Jenkins removes leading "Jenkins " from plugin names on the
>>>> UI because it's so useless, so I expect that users will not generally
>>>> consider that part of the plugin name.)
>>>>
>>>> IMO it's legitimate branding of their plugins. Note that most (or all)
>>>> Cloudbees Plugins have that prefix (it's just the only one available on the
>>>> Jenkins project hosted update center, and that only since version 4.0 was
>>>> open sourced).
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>> Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>> topic/jenkinsci-dev/T_V9Z71rbPk/unsubscribe.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/jenkinsci-dev/T_V9Z71rbPk/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to