It sounds like it would be best if you became another maintainer of the plugin if the current maintainer doesn't have time at the moment.

If the maintainer was ok with that, we can give you commit access now.

In any case, from a user's point of view, it's better to have one plugin than multiple plugins that are broadly similar.

Regards,
Chris


On 25/05/15 05:08, Mike Rogers wrote:
I did finally get in contact with the maintainer of the Rally plugin.
However, given the recent goings-on in his life and the amount that I've
been throwing at him, I'm wondering if it would be in both of our
interests to fork and have two separate plugins. Mine focuses more on
the SCM integration; the original favors Rally 'accounting', i.e.
maintaining time spent and estimates from within the context of commit
messages.

Are there any thoughts? I still haven't managed to get an accepted pull
request or any feedback from a code review. I'll be backfilling tests
and refactoring for the next couple of weeks, and I have yet a few
features I'd like to add.

On Tuesday, May 19, 2015 at 9:05:00 PM UTC-4, Mike Rogers wrote:

    Hello,


    I would like commit access to the Rally plugin repository
    (https://github.com/jenkinsci/rally-plugin
    <https://github.com/jenkinsci/rally-plugin>) and potentially
    leadership of that plugin. My team is using Rally on a fairly large
    project (alongside several other teams) and I'm seeing a few areas
    where minor improvements would yield pretty cool results.


    To that end I have spent the past few days refactoring and doing
    some minor feature additions. Could I get a code review on my
    branch,
    https://github.com/mike-rogers/rally-plugin/tree/minor-refactoring?
    <https://github.com/mike-rogers/rally-plugin/tree/minor-refactoring?> I
    have hooked it up to Travis-CI (the irony of which I recognize) and
    the build is green:
    https://travis-ci.org/mike-rogers/rally-plugin/branches
    <https://travis-ci.org/mike-rogers/rally-plugin/branches>


    I have added tests and refactored pretty heavily, while trying to
    keep the logic intact. If you review, I suggest getting a feel for
    the original repo and then looking at mine with fresh eyes. Looking
    at diffs may prove more confusing than not.


    If there are any questions or concerns, I love feedback. Please feel
    free to contact me.


    Thank you!


    -Mike


    PS - I have reached out to the primary committer of the repository,
    but his account has been nearly free of activity lately and I've
    heard nothing back.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins 
Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/5565B220.2020305%40orr.me.uk.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to