On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:39:36 +0200, Stephen Connolly
<[email protected]> wrote:
My view is that fixing the security hole trumps backwards
compatibility,
Personally I disagree, especially as SECURITY issues are merged into LTS
as they are now. LTS users choose stability and their vulnerabilities as
disclosed as rapidly as those of weekly release users. I do not think it
provides enough time to evaluate possible impact of such invasive fixes.
I lean towards preserving backward compatibility (in SECURITY fix) or at
least making the fix optional if breakage is inevitable.
--
oliver
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins
Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/op.x4z3g0gjsbfict%40arch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
