+1.

This is basically what I was originally thinking, and my sense is that this
is very close to what many of us want.

2015-10-07 16:45 GMT-07:00 Daniel Beck <[email protected]>:

> So from aggregating existing comments it looks to me like the following
> seems to be at least a reasonable basis for further discussion:
>
> * Use a static site generator with a Git repo on GitHub as the source for
> the site. Goal: Allow community to contribute content.
>   [Updated Confluence could also work, but would retain the problems of
> unreviewed content, comments, and non-plain text editing.]
> * Have actual content, like good documentation, especially for getting
> started. This includes moving some of the wiki's content into the site.
> * Feature the blog [and possibly the event calendar] more prominently.
> * Do not have "comments everywhere", limit to specific sections like the
> blog.
> * Make it easy to contribute, possibly through having an "Edit" ("Improve
> this page"?) link on every page, if possible.
>
> Comments?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/0146B189-5C80-4098-A05C-CE833E5CF5B2%40beckweb.net
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Kohsuke Kawaguchi

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAN4CQ4zPidLbdn5j04%3D-q%3D1G-hz7kFQ_uC2t65nvyaLfup1fvA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to