Thanks a lot for the definitive answer Jesse. I'm watching the issue. In the meantime I've indeed switched to Groovy views for at least better detection of refactored names.
Cheers 2015-10-27 23:01 GMT+01:00 Jesse Glick <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Baptiste Mathus <[email protected]> wrote: > > is this expected? (I mean, calling something absent and that being just > > ignored) > > Yes. > > > is there a way to enable an aggressive mode, at least for example in dev > > mode, that would just throw a stack trace in my face? > > No. > > JEXL and Jelly were just poor choices for a rendering engine in a big, > modular application. You can use Groovy views, which will report some > errors of this kind, though Groovy is a sufficiently complex and > dynamic language that it will let almost anything past the compiler, > and a lot of weird stuff past the runtime too. > > I filed https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-31203 to track > some ideas I have been mulling over. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANfRfr2vZdOVgPb8OuYRrFQDj9JYsLd6aQG5cJOax9dxxPCCmA%40mail.gmail.com > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net Sauvez un arbre, Mangez un castor ! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANWgJS4Os202YqgnYwQv38R1S19XG88%3DJGt9Ls83ZYV8_5JTnA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
