On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:04 AM, ogondza <[email protected]> wrote: > I do not consider JENKINS-31718 to be a serious candidate for .3 as will > likely not make it to the core when LTS is released
We can push it to `master` today. I would urge you to reconsider. This is a potentially serious regression introduced in .2. Regressions should be exempt from the soak period requirement IMO. I also advocate for JENKINS-31649 to be included and will work on a matching fix with test to `workflow-plugin`. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANfRfr3MstZkiqMXAPv%3DGegTG8jhnUXp3Bq20Fo0A%3DzCUc7VGw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
