> On 24.12.2015, at 19:48, Bryson Gibbons <[email protected]> wrote: > > The only arguments I can see against that are the time to change the > component and repo names, and that "negotiate-sso" may better follow a naming > convention.
We can coordinate a time that works for you. I doubt too many people rely on the existing component name, and GitHub redirects the old repo URL to the new one anyway. > I was guessing that changing the artifactId would probably break updates, as > well as a few other things - the download history, for example. Yes, it is considered a different plugin. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CB87AEA3-2A3F-47B2-8C1F-3D1922897051%40beckweb.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
