On 07/01/16 21:37, Jesse Glick wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Christopher Orr <[email protected]> wrote: >> PRs opened in the future should be >> reviewed and merged within a certain time period (1 month?), otherwise >> they should get the "proposed-for-close" label > > I do not like the idea of closing a PR merely because no reviewers > have gotten to it yet.
Yeah, I can understand that. Alternative proposals would be gratefully accepted, even if it is "PRs may end up lying around for years, unmerged". Regards, Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/568EDCD5.1070808%40orr.me.uk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
