On 22 January 2016 at 10:57, Robert Sandell <[email protected]> wrote:
> The changes you showed in the video is in my mind not worthy of a 2.0 > label but could have been done in a weekly. > Ok, so reading between the lines here, it sounds like you are saying that you believe a change worthy of a 2.0 label needs to be a change that can't be made in 1.x i.e. a breaking change. To the best of my knowledge, that is not what 2.0 is about, but does sound like 3.0. Anyway ... 1.x, 2.x, 3.x debates aside... I did say this was still a WiP, but it sounds like it's not something that tickles your fancy, which is fine ... this is what we're trying to find out ... are people for or against it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CA%2BbPao%2BBKrFUJ1LRiN%2BWNVGpCZntYXPjK%2B3XRE1Cj%2BVsVZdc1w%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
